Which of the following is considered a quantitative tool in reading?

The identification of word length measurements as a quantitative tool in reading is accurate because quantitative tools are those that involve numerical data or metrics that can be measured and analyzed statistically. Word length measurements provide specific numerical values related to the number of letters or syllables in words, allowing educators and researchers to assess text complexity and reading proficiency in a clear and concise manner. This numeric data can be critical for tracking student progress, understanding reading development, and making instructional decisions based on measurable outcomes.

In contrast, other options such as reading logs, peer assessments, and qualitative feedback do not focus on numerical analysis. Reading logs typically include records of reading habits and books completed without quantifiable metrics of proficiency. Peer assessments often involve subjective judgments and comments from peers, which, while valuable for providing insights into reading comprehension or engagement, do not translate into numerical data. Qualitative feedback, too, is focused on subjective observations about a reader’s strengths and weaknesses, lacking the measurable characteristics that define a quantitative approach. Hence, word length measurements stand out as the definitive quantitative tool among the provided options.